Minenportal.de - Rohstoffe von Bergbauunternehmen und Minengesellschaften aus aller Welt

First Uranium announces financial results for the three months ended June 30, 2012

15.08.2012  |  CNW

For the Management Discussion & Analysis and Financial Statements please refer to the Corporation's website at www.firsturanium.com

TORONTO and JOHANNESBURG, Aug. 14, 2012 /CNW/ - First Uranium Corporation (TSX:FIU.UN) (JSE:FUU) (ISIN:CA33744R5047) ("First Uranium" or "the Corporation") today announced its financial results for the three month period ended June 30, 2012.


Summary of Recent Developments

Results for Q1 2013

Gold sales for the three months ended June 30, 2012 ("Q1 2013") of 30,636 ounces, which is 11% lower than the 34,439 ounces sold for the three months ended June 30, 2011 ("Q1 2012"), and 7% lower than the 32,931 ounces sold during the three months ended March 31, 2012 ("Q4 2012"). The Corporation also sold 26,733 pounds of uranium in Q1 2013 compared to 31,407 pounds in Q1 2012 and 23,675 pounds in Q4 2012.

Total proceeds* (refer to note at end) from gold and uranium sold by the Corporation's two operations was US$44.2 million in Q1 2013 (Q1 2012: US$42.3 million; Q4 2012: US$48.0 million), which is 4% higher and 8% lower compared to Q1 2012 and Q4 2012, respectively.

Mine Waste Solutions ("MWS") generated US$26.7 million (Q1 2012: US$26.6 million; Q4 2012: US$33.9 million) in proceeds from 20,295 ounces of gold sold (Q1 2012: 21,546 ounces; Q4 2012: 24,862 ounces) at a Cash Cost** (refer to note at end) of US$847 per ounce (Q1 2012: US$663 per ounce; Q4 2012: US$790 per ounce).

Even though MWS's tonnage throughput for Q1 2013 was 7% lower compared to Q1 2012 with a resultant 6% drop in gold ounces sold, gold revenues improved slightly (1%) quarter-on-quarter due to on-average higher gold selling prices.

Since Q3 2012, MWS has experienced some challenges with the introduction of new material into the mining mix which resulted in lower average grade delivered to its gold circuits. Towards the end of Q4 2012, MWS's performance was further impacted negatively by recalcitrant clay levels at the Buffelsfontein #3 tailings dam that reduced volumes and hence content of feed material delivered to and extracted by the plant infrastructure. Consequently, the tonnage throughput (9%) and gold recoveries (13%) for Q1 2013 were lower compared to that of Q4 2012, resulting in a reduction of 18% in gold ounces sold. The lower ounces sold combined with on-average gold selling prices in Q1 2013 compared to Q4 2012 resulted in the 21% decrease in gold revenues from MWS.

The 20% increase in costs in Q1 2013 compared to Q1 2012 was due to a number of factors, including additional power costs of operating the new TSF, additional water costs and substantial increases to the cost of certain key reagents. The 13% increase in costs compared to Q4 2012 was driven by labour increases which was effective from the start of the quarter along with higher power costs due to tariff increases and winter rates taking effect during Q1 2013.

Due to the Corporation's decision to dispose of its principal assets at the start of Q4 2012, no amortization for the MWS assets was provided for on a consolidated basis since the start of the 2012 calendar year.

The 7% higher gross profit in Q1 2013 compared to Q1 2012 was primarily attributable to the fact that no amortization was provided for in Q1 2013. The 33% lower gross profit compared to Q4 2012 was attributable to the lower revenues along with higher costs in Q1 2013 as discussed above.

The Ezulwini Mine generated US$16.1 million (Q1 2012: US$13.8 million; Q4 2012: US$12.9 million) in proceeds from 10,341 ounces of gold sold (Q1 2012: 12,893 ounces; Q4 2012: 8,069 ounces) at a Cash Cost of US$1,614 per ounce (Q1 2012: US$2,344 per ounce; Q4 2012: US$2,217 per ounce).

Although the gold ounces sold was 20% lower compared to Q1 2012, gold revenues improved by 17%. The improvement in revenue was primarily due to on-average higher gold selling prices compared to Q1 2012, and further aided by the reduction in the ounces of gold delivered to Franco Nevada ("FN") at US$400 per ounce pursuant to the Ezulwini Gold Stream Transaction from effectively 40% of total gold production in Q1 2012 to 7% as of January 2012. Costs were significantly lower compared to Q1 2012 due to the restructuring process that was implemented towards the end of Q4 2012 along with various cost cutting initiatives that were implemented over the course of FY 2012.

The mine started to realize the benefits from the restructuring process that was implemented during Q4 2012 as can be seen by the 13% improvement in tonnes milled and a 2% improvement in gold recoveries that resulted in a 27% increase in gold ounces sold compared to Q4 2012. Consequently, gold revenues were also higher compared to Q4 2012, although the increase was slightly lower due to the on-average lower gold selling prices compared to the previous quarter. Costs were only 6% lower compared to Q4 2012 primarily as a result of labour increases that became effective at the start of Q1 2013, as well as higher power costs due to tariff increases and winter rates taking effect in during the quarter.

Due to the Corporation's decision to dispose of its principal assets at the start of Q4 2012, no amortization for the Ezulwini Mine assets was provided for on a consolidated basis since the start of the 2012 calendar year.

The improvement in revenues and the reduction in costs in Q1 2013 compared to Q1 2012 and Q4 2012 resulted in gross losses from the Ezulwini Mine decreasing substantially, by 97% and 89%, respectively.

The Corporation reported consolidated gross profits for Q1 2013 compared to consolidated gross losses for Q1 2012, primarily as a result of the improvement in performance and reduction in costs by the Ezulwini Mine quarter-on-quarter. The poor performance by MWS in Q1 2013 compared to Q4 2012 more than offset the improved performance and cost reductions from the Ezulwini Mine and resulted in a marginal decrease in gross profits compared to the previous quarter.

First Uranium's consolidated pre-tax profit of US$30.7 million in Q1 2013 showed a US$70.5 million improvement compared to the consolidated pre-tax loss of Q1 2012 (Q1 2012: US$39.8 million; Q4 2012: US$22.7 million). The primary driver for the improvement was the derivative income related to the Gold Stream Transactions of US$34.9 million recognized in Q1 2013 compared to a derivative expense of US$22.3 million recognized in Q1 2012.

The Corporation (including discontinued operations) generated US$4.1 million cash from its operations in Q1 2013, compared to cash utilized of US$5.4 million in Q1 2012. The Corporation utilized US$2.7 million during Q1 2013 (Q1 2012: US$15.9 million) on capital projects at the operations. The much lower capital expenditure in Q1 2013 compared to Q1 2012 reflects the completion of the major capital projects at MWS which occurred during Q3 2012.

As at June 30, 2012, current assets, including current assets from discontinued operations, were US$25.5 million (March 31, 2012: US$21.9 million) and included cash and cash equivalents of US$11.7 million (March 31, 2012: US$6.7 million). First Uranium's current assets, excluding current assets from discontinued operations, were US$3.0 million as at June 30, 2012 and included cash equivalents of US$2.3 million.


NOTES:
*Proceeds are non-IFRS measurements and investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on it and are advised to read all IFRS accounting disclosures presented in the Corporation's Financial Statements.

**Cash Costs are costs directly related to the physical activities of producing gold and uranium and include mining, processing and other plant costs; third-party refining and smelting costs; marketing expense, on-site general and administrative costs; royalties; on-mine drilling expenditures that are related to production and other direct costs. Sales of by-product metals such as uranium and silver are deducted from the above in computing cash costs. Cash costs exclude depreciation, depletion and amortization, corporate general and administrative expense, exploration, interest, and pre-feasibility costs and accruals for mine reclamation. Cash costs are calculated and presented using the "Gold Institute Production Cost Standard" applied consistently for all periods presented. The Gold Institute was a non-profit industry association comprised of leading gold producers, refiners, bullion suppliers and manufacturers. This institute has now been incorporated into the National Mining Association. The guidance was first issued in 1996 and revised in November 1999. Total cash costs per ounce is a non-IFRS measurement and investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on it and are advised to read all IFRS accounting disclosures presented in the Corporation's Financial Statements.



Non-IFRS Measures

The Corporation believes that in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with IFRS, the Corporation and certain investors and analysts use certain other non-IFRS financial measures to evaluate the Corporation's performance including its ability to generate cash flow and profits from its operations. The Corporation has included certain non-IFRS measures in this document. Non-IFRS measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed under IFRS, and therefore they may not be comparable to similar measures employed by other companies. The data is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Readers are advised to read all IFRS accounting disclosures presented in the Corporation's Financial Statements for more detail.


Cautionary Language Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This news release contains and refers to forward-looking information based on current expectations. All other statements other than statements of historical fact included in this release are forward-looking statements (or forward-looking information). The Corporation's plans involve various estimates and assumptions and its business and operations are subject to various risks and uncertainties. For more details on these estimates, assumptions, risks and uncertainties, see the Corporation's most recent Annual Information Form and most recent Management Discussion and Analysis on file with the Canadian provincial securities regulatory authorities on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date hereof and there can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, such statements are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements that are included herein, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.




SOURCE First Uranium Corporation

Mary Batoff
+1 416 306 3072 or mary@firsturanium.ca
www.firsturanium.com